This week’s panellists had been requested in the event that they nonetheless wish to see Chris Eubank Jnr and Conor Benn share a hoop following Benn’s constructive performance-enhancing drug take a look at
Denzel Bentley (British middleweight champion)
If it’s going to be rescheduled, I don’t assume it’s honest to place the (weight) restrictions on. However no matter they do, they do. The controversy that has occurred will deliver extra eyes to it, I’m certain. Plus, what makes it even greater subsequent 12 months is the truth that subsequent 12 months marks 30 years because the second Benn-Eubank battle. All the things simply must be seemed over earlier than something, although.
Michael Conlan (Featherweight contender)
Though I disagree with it, I feel the curiosity and the what-if issue has positively gone up. However, for me, it mustn’t occur. In the event you fail a drug take a look at, you ought to be banned.
Dave Allen (Heavyweight contender)
I’ve zero curiosity in seeing them battle one another after what occurred final week. Conor Benn has simply failed a drug take a look at and for that I wish to see him face a four-year ban.
Ryan Walsh (Former British featherweight champion)
Zero. It was a make-do battle within the first place for Eubank Jnr. The attention-grabbing elements to me had been the household historical past and rehydration clauses. I’d have favored to see the psychological and bodily affect on each. Finally, although, for me it was a easy case of “a very good huge one will beat a very good baby”. PEDs, after all, now clearly alter this line of thought.